- President Donald Trump didn’t want injured veterans to be current at a army parade as a result of he believed it will make spectators uneasy, sources mentioned an Atlantic report revealed Thursday.
- “Nobody wants to see that,” Trump reportedly mentioned.
- Trump has repeatedly demanded army parades all through his tenure in workplace, a transfer nationwide safety consultants say mirrors the actions of authoritarian regimes like North Korea.
- The White House issued a number of statements disputing The Atlantic’s story on Thursday, calling it a “disgrace” and “patently false.”
- Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.
President Donald Trump didn’t want injured veterans to be current at a army parade as a result of he believed it will make spectators uneasy, The Atlantic reported Thursday.
“Nobody wants to see that,” Trump mentioned throughout a White House assembly forward of a deliberate army parade in 2018, in accordance to sources who spoke to The Atlantic’s editor in chief. The president reportedly wished to maintain an enormous army parade in Washington, DC, that yr to coincide with Veterans Day weekend and the 100th anniversary of World War I.
The parade was estimated to value round $92 million, in accordance to CNBC, and was ultimately delayed.
On July 4, 2019, Trump held a “Salute to America” parade within the nation’s capital. The show infuriated native officers and Democratic lawmakers who mentioned it was a expensive and pointless show of American army would possibly.
“Our July 4th Salute to America at the Lincoln Memorial is looking to be really big,” Trump mentioned on Twitter. “It will be the show of a lifetime!”
“The cost of our great Salute to America tomorrow will be very little compared to what it is worth,” the president added, forward of the parade.
The president has repeatedly demanded army parades all through his tenure at the White House, in a transfer that nationwide safety consultants say mirrors the actions of authoritarian regimes like North Korea.
Laurence Tribe, a constitutional regulation professor who’s ceaselessly essential of the president, wrote of the July 4 parade, “The resemblance to days before Tiananmen Square is chilling.”
Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, a former Marine Corps officer who can also be an outspoken Trump critic, mocked the president’s calls for for the army parade.
“Trump’s military parade is such a great idea that it’s hard to imagine it coming from anyone who better understands the truths about what our troops want than a man who took five deferments to avoid serving himself,” Moulton tweeted at the time.
Trump reportedly got here up with the concept of a grand military-themed parade after he attended one in France in July, in honor of Bastille Day, in accordance to The Washington Post. Trump was met with army autos and troops, to which he later informed Macron that “it was one of the greatest parades I’ve ever seen.”
The president additionally ceaselessly touts his assist for US veterans and their households and has falsely claimed greater than 150 occasions that he’s accountable for the passage of the Veterans Choice Act of 2014. However, Trump was not president at the time, and his predecessor, Barack Obama, signed the invoice into regulation.
The White House issued a number of statements disputing The Atlantic’s story on Thursday.
“This report is patently false,” White House spokesperson Alyssa Farah mentioned. “President Trump holds the military in the highest regard. He’s demonstrated his commitment to them at every turn: delivering on his promise to give our troops a much needed pay raise, increasing military spending, signing critical veterans reforms, and supporting military spouses. These nameless anecdotes have no basis in fact and are offensive fiction.”
Judd Deere, one other spokesperson, additionally put out a press release sharply denying the report’s claims, writing on Twitter, “Not a soul brave enough to put their name on any of these accusations. That’s because they are false. Just another anonymously sourced story meant to tear down a Commander-in-Chief who loves our military and has delivered on the promises he’s made. What a disgrace!”