Nam Tai Property Inventory: NYSE Suspension Provides Insult To Harm (NYSE:NTP)

China, shenzhen bei Nacht

NI QIN/E+ through Getty Photos

Over the previous 18 months, shares of Shenzhen-based actual property developer Nam Tai Property (NYSE:NTP) or “Nam Tai” have skilled a wild journey after a profitable activist investor marketing campaign appeared to have freed the corporate from the clutches of a lot bigger peer Kaisa Group.

After rallying by greater than 600% at its peak in June 2021, the downturn within the Chinese language actual property market began to influence the inventory value within the second half of final yr.

Issues bought worse after Deutsche Financial institution AG (DB) foreclosed on ailing Kaisa Group’s 23.9% stake within the firm in December.

In January, shares took one other hit after the corporate alleged its former CEO, Jiabiao Wang, having “obstructed an orderly handover of enterprise property in mainland China“.

The problem required the brand new board of administrators to safe as much as $40 million in emergency financing from its second- and third-largest shareholders at the moment, activist investor IsZo Capital Administration or “IsZo” (16.8%) and IAT Insurance coverage Group or “IAT” (14.7%), an organization managed by billionaire Peter Kellogg, additionally a long-term shareholder (3.63%) and non-executive director of Nam Tai.

In April, activist investor Oasis Administration acquired roughly 20% of the corporate’s shares from Deutsche Financial institution AG and said to be in “energetic dialogue with all events for a mutually helpful decision“.

In Could, the corporate disclosed the termination of its interim CFO and supplied a discouraging litigation replace (emphasis added by creator):

West Ridge Litigation

As beforehand disclosed, in March 2021, the BVI Courtroom discovered {that a} prior personal placement carried out in October 2020 (the “2020 PIPE”) carried out by the Firm was void. Associated to this litigation, the Firm, beneath the prior administration workforce and Board, entered right into a settlement and indemnity settlement (the “Indemnity Settlement”) with West Ridge Funding Firm Restricted (“West Ridge”), a subsidiary of Haitong Worldwide Securities Co Ltd, offering for, amongst different issues, the return of funds of roughly USD $24 million representing the acquisition value paid by West Ridge within the 2020 PIPE if the 2020 PIPE was declared invalid.

On Could 17, 2021, West Ridge sought return of such funds within the BVI Courtroom. The Firm filed a protection and counterclaim on February 25, 2022 alleging amongst different issues that the prior Board of the Firm and West Ridge conspired to impact the 2020 PIPE to provide Kaisa efficient management of the Firm. On April 7, 2022, the BVI Courtroom delivered a judgment in favor of West Ridge and concluded that the phrases of the Indemnity Settlement stand to be enforced topic to any points as to quantum. Following this judgment, the Firm has made an software for a keep to the BVI Courtroom, which is listed to be heard on June 8, 2022. If the keep is denied, the Firm will consider its choices almost about different authorized choices as to the judgment and the quantity. After such analysis, one risk could also be that the Firm will probably be required to pay the judgment within the close to time period.

Higher Sail Litigation

Bear in mind, Higher Sail or “GSL” is a subsidiary of Kaisa Group which represented the lead investor within the $170 million October 2020 personal placement (“the 2020 PIPE”).


Individually, on December 27, 2021, GSL filed a lawsuit within the PRC in opposition to the Firm, Nam Tai Group Restricted (“NTG”), Nam Tai Funding (Shenzhen) Co Ltd (“NTI”), and Zastron Digital (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. (“Zastron”), all of that are the Firm’s wholly owned subsidiaries, alleging that it owns (i) fairness held by NTG in NTI representing a USD $45 million capital contribution, and (ii) fairness held by NTI in Zastron representing a RMB 50 million capital contribution. In December 2021, the Shenzhen Intermediate Courtroom froze sure of NTG’s and NTI’s shares associated to sure capital contributions as described within the previous sentence.

NTP was served on February 8, 2022 and filed an objection to the court docket’s jurisdiction, on which the court docket has not but rendered a choice.

As beforehand disclosed within the Firm’s Type 20-F for the yr ended December 31, 2020, on March 12, 2021, the Firm acquired a discover from GSL associated to the Buy Settlement for the 2020 PIPE (as outlined under), beneath which the Firm issued and offered 16,051,219 of its widespread shares to GSL for USD $146.9 million. On this discover, GSL sought an order requiring the Firm to repay such consideration from the 2020 PIPE. The arbitrator granted GSL an interim preservation order over sure of the Firm’s funds in reference to this arbitration. The arbitration is ongoing.

Please observe that the overwhelming majority of the PIPE proceeds have been invested in a Greensill-linked provide chain fund managed by Credit score Suisse which was terminated in March 2021. Based on Credit score Suisse, remaining buyers trapped within the funds are “unlikely to recoup their losses for no less than one other 5 years, if in any respect“.

Wang Jiabiao Litigation

Wang Jiabiao, the Firm’s former Chief Government Officer, filed a declare within the PRC, dated February 26, 2022, difficult the resolutions eradicating him from positions on the Firm and its on-shore subsidiaries (the “Wang Litigation”). Though the Firm doesn’t consider his claims have authorized benefit, the lawsuit is amongst Wang Jiabiao’s principal efforts in obstructing the change of management of the Firm’s on-shore subsidiaries.

In its respective SEC-filing, Nam Tai has warned buyers that this new litigation might lead to an extra delay to the corporate’s efforts of gaining on-shore entry and management.

Different Proceedings

China Nuclear Trade 22nd Development Co., Ltd. filed a declare within the PRC in opposition to NTI within the quantity of roughly RMB 211 million. The Firm doesn’t presently have any further particulars on this continuing.

As of the date of the submitting, the corporate had $12.2 million in obtainable liquidity and potential entry to a different $10 million as a part of the January emergency financing topic to lender consent:

This quantity isn’t enough to pay the total quantity of the legal responsibility beneath the West Ridge litigation beforehand described if it have been to develop into due now. As a result of administration and Board members of the Firm lack entry to the Firm’s financial institution accounts and different liquid property within the PRC, the Firm is assessing its choices whether it is required to fulfill a judgment within the West Ridge litigation, together with, amongst different issues, attempting to entry funds positioned in sure accounts that the Firm presently can’t entry, conducting fairness or debt financings, or looking for court docket or administrative safety in opposition to fee of the judgment.

On Could 23, the NYSE halted buying and selling within the firm’s widespread shares resulting from “regulatory considerations concerning the Firm’s lack of direct management over the Firm’s chops“. Even worse, whereas the buying and selling halt stays in place, Nam Tai’s inventory can neither be traded on one other change nor within the OTC markets.

Two weeks in the past, the Excessive Courtroom of Justice within the British Virgin Islands entered judgement in favor of West Ridge within the quantity of USD $23.8 million however granted Nam Tai the permission to attraction:

The BVI Courtroom held that curiosity, damages and prices and whether or not West Ridge shall be entitled to a tracing treatment along with the USD $23.8 million judgment will probably be decided at a listening to to be held not earlier than September 15, 2022. As well as, the BVI Courtroom granted the Firm permission to attraction the April 7th Order to the Japanese Caribbean Courtroom of Enchantment and granted the Firm a keep of the April 7th Order. This ruling prevents West Ridge from looking for to implement its judgment in opposition to the Firm pending the attraction of this case apart from sure actual property in Hong Kong and monies held in an account with Credit score Suisse, each held by Hong Kong subsidiaries of the Firm.

Backside Line:

What a large number. Even within the unlikely case the corporate’s abroad shareholders someway handle to take management of Nam Tai and its Chinese language mainland property, they’d nonetheless should cope with $170 million in PIPE reimbursement claims and different authorized proceedings.

Furthermore, Nam Tai apparently used nearly $20 million of the as much as $40 million January emergency financing inside simply 4 months. At this tempo, the corporate would require further funds in direction of the top of Q3.

Given the complicated points concerned right here, it’s tough to ascertain a near-term, amicable resolution so buyers higher put together for the NYSE buying and selling halt not being lifted anytime quickly.

The unhappy story of Nam Tai very a lot highlights the chance for abroad buyers seeking to acquire management of property in China’s troubled actual property market.

Related posts

Co-Diagnostics, Inc. Indicators Settlement to Purchase all Property and Mental Property Associated to At-House/Level-of-Care Platform


Simon Property Group (SPG) to Launch Earnings on Monday


King County property values rise at ‘unprecedented’ charges; tax hikes probably