Sept 29 (Reuters) – The U.S. Commerce Division on Wednesday requested a bunch of nameless home photo voltaic producers for extra data earlier than it could contemplate a request to impose duties on panels produced in three Southeast Asian international locations.
The transfer delays the division’s resolution which had been anticipated this week. The case is the newest dispute between U.S. photo voltaic venture builders that depend on low cost imports for many of their provides and the tiny home manufacturing sector that claims it might’t compete successfully with the flood of low-priced imports from Asia.
U.S. photo voltaic venture builders have lobbied forcefully towards any Commerce investigation into new tariffs, saying the probe alone would spook international photo voltaic producers they depend on and cripple a sector that’s important to assembly the nation’s local weather change objectives.
The nameless group searching for the tariffs final month requested the Commerce Division to analyze whether or not imports from Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam had been unfair. It accuses Chinese language producers of shifting manufacturing to these nations to keep away from U.S. duties on photo voltaic cells and panels made in China.
On Wednesday, the Commerce division despatched the group’s legal professional, Timothy Brightbill, a letter that set an Oct. 6 deadline for the so-called American Photo voltaic Producers In opposition to Chinese language Circumvention to reply to a collection of questions.
One query asks members of the group to determine themselves. The group stated in filings with Commerce that its members want to stay nameless as a result of they worry retribution within the market, a declare the division has additionally requested it to elucidate.
The division stated it could concern a call inside 45 days of receiving a response.
Brightbill didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
The U.S. Photo voltaic Vitality Industries Affiliation, the commerce group that opposes the tariff request, stated it was dissatisfied that the division didn’t dismiss the group’s petition outright, however stated the extra data would present that the petitioners “don’t have any case.”
Reporting by Nichola Groom; Modifying by Leslie Adler, Richard Chang and Aurora Ellis
Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.